A writer recently asked me the following question about feedback he received from the Dramatica software which suggested his character’s Purposes should be Knowledge and Actuality:
I don’t understand what
Dramatica means by a character’s Purpose. Purpose in life?–Nobody knows what
that is although some think they do. I understand Knowledge and Actuality as
stated in Dramatica Dictionary. But I cannot put Purpose, knowledge, and
actuality together in a meaningful, parallel context without Purpose meaning the
same thing as Methodology, i.e., he uses “knowledge” and “reality”. I feel there
is a SIMPLE explanation and I’m making it complex.
In regard to “simplicity”, Dramatica theory is like Zen. There
are simple explanations if all you want it a specific solution to a specific
problem. But, the deeper you go, the more the simple explanations begin to form
larger patterns until an overview of the whole durn mechanism of story begins to
clarify. With that view comes a mastery of structure that guides creativity,
channels it, but never inhibits it.
In regard to your particular
First of all, Dramatica divides character into two aspects – the
Subjective qualities, which represent character points of view (what the
characters see) and Objective qualities, which represents how the characters
function in the big picture.
From the Subjective view, one cannot see
what can be seen from the “God’s Eye View” of the big picture – the view we
can’t get in real life, the Objective view.
When answering questions
about character Motivations, Methodologies, Evaluations, and Purposes, Dramatica
is focusing on the Objective View. So, from that perspective of standing outside
the story and looking in, we not only can, but MUST know our character’s
Purposes. If we do not, how can we frame a cogent argument about the relative
value of human qualities to our audience?
Of course, the Character will
never see ANY of these aspects: not Motivations, Methods, Evaluations, nor
Purposes. You see, the qualities that make us up are like the carrier waves of
our self-awareness, the operating system of our personality, the foundation of
our outlook. They describe where we stand, not what we are looking at. So, when
choosing elements for your characters’ qualities, make sure to describe what
each character really is, as seen from an Objective outside view. Describe how
it functions, now how it feels. Describe how it is to be seen, not how it
This phase of story creation is where you, as author, determine
what the ACTUAL meaning of the story is, when all the smoke clears, when the
audience can look back on the finished story and say, “This is what this
character was really like – this is what kind of attributes he had, these are
the human qualities it represents.”
Next, there is a common
misunderstanding of what “Purpose” is. This actually occurs because writers
often look at Purpose as if it were a Motivation. For example, if you ask an
author what a character’s motivation is, he might say, “to be president.” But in
fact, achieving the office of the presidency is his Purpose – simply defined as,
what he hopes to accomplish, arrive at, or possess. His Motivation, on the other
hand, is WHY he wants to be president. And, this might be any one of a number of
things, such as that he never had any power as a child, or that he feels
inadequate and needs the accolades. For any given Purpose, there can be any
number of Motivations, and vice versa.
So, when choosing your characters’
Purposes, you need to ask yourself, what kinds of things (what categories of
things) do I want this character, driven by his Motivations, to be trying to
achieve? There are no limitations as to which Purposes can be the particular
“goals” for any given motivations. In fact, it is the combination you choose
that gives a unique identity to your character, either as an archetype where the
Motivations are topically connected to similar associated Purposes or as more
complex characters in which the Purposes are of completely different kinds of
thing than the Motivations.
Now it might seem that a character will, in
fact, see what his Purpose is. After all, if he wants to be president, he’s
gotta be aware of that fact! True, but what he doesn’t see is that his
UNDERLYING Purpose is “Actuality.” In such a story, there might be a character
that is a power broker behind the scenes. He is the President de facto, because
the actual president merely rubber-stamps our character’s decisions, and reads
the speeches our character writes. But, our character’s Purpose is Actuality, so
he feels as if he has achieved nothing. Only if he ACTUALLY becomes president
will he ever feel he has accomplished his Purpose.
It is important to
note that ANY of the Purpose Elements could show up in the story as “wanting to
be president.” For example, “Knowledge” as a purpose could be written so that
our character wants to KNOW what it is like to be president. He has stood next
to the president, he can imagine what it is like, but unless he sits behind the
desk in the Oval Office himself, he’ll never really KNOW.
Knowledge and Actuality together, our character has Purpose of becoming
president because he must Know what it is Actually like. ANY subject matter can
be fit to ANY elements. This might seem as if nothing definitive is really being
determined about your structure. In fact, it is the choice as to which elements
are to be represented in the subject matter that give the subject matter a
specific flavor, or spin, and thereby makes it more than simple storytelling.
Only when the subject matter is presented as representing particular outlooks
does it take on the mantle of dramatic significance. The matching of functional
elements to the subject matter creates perspective, and it is perspective in
which all dramatic meaning is held.
Again, like Zen, the exploration of
story structure has many levels of depth and meaning. The more one learns about
Dramatica and the Objective Character Elements, the more sophistication one
develops in sculpting interesting characters of unusual identity yet valid
composition. And it is upon such characters that a cogent and complete argument
regarding the relative value of human qualities must be built.